REVVITY, INC.

RVTY

Forward P/E: 21.49×
Mkt cap: 14.1 B USD
EV: 16.4 B USD
Sector: Healthcare
Coverage: 2008–2025
Currency: USD
Next event: Feb 24, 2027

JP Valuation

JP Score

22,5

Out of profile · window 5 years

JP entry price

OUT OF PROFILE

No target price is issued: the company falls outside the profile this method looks for.

Financial comments3

Stagnation: 3-year earnings CAGR at or below zero. It is scored, not cut: the penalty is charged by the Impairment modifier, where it is continuous and capped.
ROIC below the required return: growth destroys value.
Impairment of fcf: 19 % of the window, weighted by recency → 2.3 points. It is the only place in the model where a bad year subtracts.

Calculation comments3

The publicado consensus candidate was rejected (nivel_inicial_implausible) and is not used.
The consensus EPS is rebuilt as estimated net income ÷ 116,522,222 shares — the count the income statement itself implies, not the one the market declares, which counts a single share class.
Anomalous financial year(s) in FCF (M4 payout) (2023): out of this component's estimators; they still count in the counters and hard cuts.

Quality factors

Each factor scores 0–100 on its own scale; the score is their weighted average.

Score	Weight → points
Growth consistency8 Earnings · fit to the log-linear line · σ_resid = 0.30322 %0 Earnings · hit rate · 26 %16 %0 Earnings · volatility · σ = 0.49811 %0 Revenue · fit to the log-linear line · σ_resid = 0.07014 %0 Revenue · hit rate · 57 %11 %6 Revenue · volatility · σ = 0.0947 %85 Forward · trajectory coherence · consensus 7.9 % vs. trend -24.5 %20 %5	·20 → 1,53
Growth pace16 Realized · -27.5 %50 %0 Expected · 7.9 %50 %32	·20 → 3,19
No recent stagnation50 Realized slowdown · 0.82×50 %1 Expected slowdown · -0.29×50 %99 3-year earnings CAGR at or below zero (-22.4 %): the engine has slowed. It is scored on the acceleration scale, not cut — a binary cut turned a continuous fact into a cliff, and fired on 36 % of the universe. Stagnation: 3-year earnings CAGR at or below zero. It is scored, not cut: the penalty is charged by the Impairment modifier, where it is continuous and capped.	·15 → 7,45
FCF quality99 FCF / net income conversion · 1.38×100 %99 Window chosen: last 3 years (the best of those evaluated). Alternative · last 5 years: conversion 1.32× → 98 points. Positive FCF in 3 of the 3 years in the window.	·15 → 14,92
Debt18 Net debt / EBITDA · 3.22×100 %18 Interest coverage (EBIT / \|interest\|) = 4.0×.	·15 → 2,74
Return on invested capital (ROIC)1 Level (recency-weighted mean) · 4.3 %50 %0 Spread over the required return · −0.1 pp over the 10 % required30 %0 Trend · −5.3 pp over 5 years20 %6 Average ROIC (4.3 %) below the required return (10 %): growth destroys value. ROIC below the required return: growth destroys value.	·15 → 0,17
Weighted base	·100 → 30,01

Modifiers and penalties

The factors build the score; the modifiers correct it, within +23 / −28. Same 0–100 bar, 100 is always good.

Score	Range	Points
Gross margin trend · −4.8 pp accumulated over 4 years2	±8	-7,7
Altman Z'' · Z'' = 7.11100	0/−15	0,0
Shareholder returns · shareholder yield 2.5 %17 Effective buyback (net share count) · 2.3 %15 Dividend yield (last DPS / price today) · 0.2 %1	+15/−5	+2,5
Impairment · 19 % · worst magnitude: fcf81 Earnings · 0.0 %100 Free cash flow · 19.1 %81 EBITDA · 0.0 %100	0/−12	-2,3
30,0 − 7,7 + 0,0 + 2,5 − 2,3 =22,5

Calculated on Sep 5, 2026

Score

Weight → points

Growth consistency8

Earnings · fit to the log-linear line · σ_resid = 0.30322 %0
Earnings · hit rate · 26 %16 %0
Earnings · volatility · σ = 0.49811 %0
Revenue · fit to the log-linear line · σ_resid = 0.07014 %0
Revenue · hit rate · 57 %11 %6
Revenue · volatility · σ = 0.0947 %85
Forward · trajectory coherence · consensus 7.9 % vs. trend -24.5 %20 %5

·20 → 1,53

Growth pace16

Realized · -27.5 %50 %0
Expected · 7.9 %50 %32

·20 → 3,19

No recent stagnation50

Realized slowdown · 0.82×50 %1
Expected slowdown · -0.29×50 %99
3-year earnings CAGR at or below zero (-22.4 %): the engine has slowed. It is scored on the acceleration scale, not cut — a binary cut turned a continuous fact into a cliff, and fired on 36 % of the universe.
Stagnation: 3-year earnings CAGR at or below zero. It is scored, not cut: the penalty is charged by the Impairment modifier, where it is continuous and capped.

·15 → 7,45

FCF quality99

FCF / net income conversion · 1.38×100 %99
Window chosen: last 3 years (the best of those evaluated).
Alternative · last 5 years: conversion 1.32× → 98 points.
Positive FCF in 3 of the 3 years in the window.

·15 → 14,92

Debt18

Net debt / EBITDA · 3.22×100 %18
Interest coverage (EBIT / |interest|) = 4.0×.

·15 → 2,74

Return on invested capital (ROIC)1

Level (recency-weighted mean) · 4.3 %50 %0
Spread over the required return · −0.1 pp over the 10 % required30 %0
Trend · −5.3 pp over 5 years20 %6
Average ROIC (4.3 %) below the required return (10 %): growth destroys value.
ROIC below the required return: growth destroys value.

·15 → 0,17

Weighted base

·100 → 30,01

Score

Range

Points

Gross margin trend · −4.8 pp accumulated over 4 years2

±8

-7,7

Altman Z'' · Z'' = 7.11100

0/−15

0,0

Shareholder returns · shareholder yield 2.5 %17

Effective buyback (net share count) · 2.3 %15
Dividend yield (last DPS / price today) · 0.2 %1

+15/−5

+2,5

Impairment · 19 % · worst magnitude: fcf81

Earnings · 0.0 %100
Free cash flow · 19.1 %81
EBITDA · 0.0 %100

0/−12

-2,3

30,0 − 7,7 + 0,0 + 2,5 − 2,3 =22,5